Here is the GISS plot:
And below is the plot that I showed here:
I've tried hard to match the colors and levels, and I don't think they are the major source of the differences, although my corresponding colors, theoretically an exact match, do seem fainter in the PNG rendition. I think part is the smoothing. The actual patterns are very similar.
In my lat/lon plot TempLS cuts out the parts near the poles (eg below 60°S), because of the distortion. But you can see them in the Hammer projection here and I'll be showing full spherical projections (with some Javascript) in my next post. TempLS shows a major warm spot around the South Pole - but based on very few stations. GISS has some of that too, but the projection makes it hard to see.
Update. MP has commented that NOAA/NCDC also has a plot out. below is the graph that he linked, and below that is my graph, in similar colors (supplied by MP) which I showed in the previous post. It's of special interest because NCDC is using essentially the same global data combination (GHCNv3/ERSST).
NCDC is also out, here is the map
ReplyDeletehttp://img819.imageshack.us/img819/6656/ncdcsurfacelandocean201.png
I've been experimenting with alternative colormaps and binning, I will get back to you on this.
MP
Thanks, MP
ReplyDeleteI've linked in an update to the post.
Incidentally, the "GISS" color scheme that I use is:
"#4094ff","#78ccff","#99eefe","#dcffdc",
"#ffffff","#ffff00","#ffcc00","#ff7f00","#ff0000","#7f0000"