tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post737515107919153906..comments2024-03-28T13:56:47.604+11:00Comments on moyhu: June global surface temperature down 0.12°CNick Stokeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-69634521372860188392017-08-14T12:28:56.027+10:002017-08-14T12:28:56.027+10:00Interesting if it was not written about on Climate...Interesting if it was not written about on Climate Audit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-15933608237857089482017-08-09T17:00:45.679+10:002017-08-09T17:00:45.679+10:00I haven't written a post. But I read the corre...I haven't written a post. But I read the correction. It seems that all the significant results become "marginally" significant (ie not). I haven't heard of the paper since. I see from Google that it was cited 32 times, often by McKitrick. The correction was cited once.Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-67679726801714882752017-08-09T11:13:53.991+10:002017-08-09T11:13:53.991+10:00Nick,
Was there a blog post discussing the 2011 c...Nick,<br /><br />Was there a blog post discussing the 2011 correction the MMH Atmos Sci Lett debable? Climate Audit post (specifically) or some other blog (less desirable, but still let me know)? <br /><br />I am interested in how much they came to grip with the errors in the 2010 paper. Also if they were open about discussing their correction. (Was bothered a bit by the "doesn't change anything" tone in it. Wonder if the major logic errors were never admitted. But still like the discussion as it played out.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-57544601219620475442017-07-18T08:31:07.090+10:002017-07-18T08:31:07.090+10:00Hi Olof,
I guess what is cooling are the land mas...Hi Olof,<br /><br />I guess what is cooling are the land masses, and the origin of the persisting sea ice extent decline might be due to the warming of the deeper ocean layers around the continent.<br />Bindidonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-30108012088828833772017-07-14T21:28:23.475+10:002017-07-14T21:28:23.475+10:00The Antarctic cooling doesn't show up in sea i...The Antarctic cooling doesn't show up in sea ice extent. 2017 is the second lowest for the time of the year, behind 1986 only, according to the Charctic sea ice graph..Olof Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18244733455655978307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-41480813423230797942017-07-14T19:58:08.686+10:002017-07-14T19:58:08.686+10:00ENSO has a sharp seasonally modulated forcing that...ENSO has a sharp seasonally modulated forcing that is narrow to the month. There are all sorts of patterns, such as a strict biennial oscillation buried in the data that few seem interested in. Or they may be interested once they understand how to extract it.@whuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18297101284358849575noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-43249010187137431902017-07-14T19:05:18.377+10:002017-07-14T19:05:18.377+10:00Because of the Antarctica cooling in June.
If I p...Because of the Antarctica cooling in June.<br /><br />If I plot the May trends from 1991 to 2016 here, I get a strong warming for Antarctica in May for this period.<br />https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/maps/<br />If I plot the June trends from 1991 to 2016, I got a similar strong cooling over Antarctica in June for this period. For July too.<br />Are there other changes, wind ... there?Ulinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-10808981532387100712017-07-12T20:47:00.137+10:002017-07-12T20:47:00.137+10:00There are like 1500 monthly data points in the mod...There are like 1500 monthly data points in the modern-day temperature record yet whenever a new data point comes out, it's like Navin Johnson yelling "The new phone book's here! The new phone book's here!"<br /><br />I just don't get the excitement ... unless we can model the variability of the past, any additional data point by itself is meaningless.<br />@whuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18297101284358849575noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-72817040259542896222017-07-12T19:04:50.873+10:002017-07-12T19:04:50.873+10:00BEST 0.67 is down 0.17C, a little more than TempLS...BEST 0.67 is down 0.17C, a little more than TempLS.Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-72948603906541570782017-07-12T17:48:29.504+10:002017-07-12T17:48:29.504+10:00Australian data has arrived now, and pulled down g...Australian data has arrived now, and pulled down global temps by 0.005 C.<br /><br />Robert Rodhe has tweeted BEST l/o for June, 0.67 C, fourth warmest June but coolest anomaly since July 2015.<br />https://twitter.com/rarohde/status/884886721158053890Olof Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18244733455655978307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-31425741361385098672017-07-10T21:37:53.993+10:002017-07-10T21:37:53.993+10:00They call off the El Niño prediction and show Niño...They call off the El Niño prediction and show Niño 3.4 temp collapsing into negative ONI in June. Now July 10, and Niño 3.4 is still very warm: nowhere close to negative ONI. JCHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-49766598194138224182017-07-09T06:22:51.556+10:002017-07-09T06:22:51.556+10:00"You are publishing June temps without Austra...<i>"You are publishing June temps without Australian data"</i><br />Yes, but I have inside information :)<br />Which is, that is was weekend here, and nothing is likely before Monday.<br />Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-59113536749227729242017-07-08T19:28:58.111+10:002017-07-08T19:28:58.111+10:00Thanks to the confirmation bias and group-think pr...Thanks to the confirmation bias and group-think promoted by deniers such as Tsonis and Lindzen, we are way behind where we should be in understanding natural temperature variability. <br /><br />Read this post <a href="http://contextearth.com/2017/07/06/confirmation-bias/" rel="nofollow">http://contextearth.com/2017/07/06/confirmation-bias/</a> to understand how this happens. <br /><br />Interesting that within the last year, geophysicists are finally admitting that the lunar tidal forces are a strong contributor to triggering earthquakes, and it is just a matter of time that the same is recognized for climate phenomena such as ENSO and QBO. Science eventually self-corrects.@whuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18297101284358849575noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-47090984500358552372017-07-08T17:58:08.052+10:002017-07-08T17:58:08.052+10:00Nick, You are publishing June temps without Austra...Nick, You are publishing June temps without Australian data ;-)<br /><br />Anyway, the fall from May has seemingly been reduced a little bit by rising SST..Olof Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18244733455655978307noreply@blogger.com