tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post5665865747981822280..comments2024-03-28T13:56:47.604+11:00Comments on moyhu: A first look at CRUTEM3 station dataNick Stokeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-28636752122516854172011-07-31T11:36:51.537+10:002011-07-31T11:36:51.537+10:00Anon,
No, I didn't - I worked direct from the ...Anon,<br />No, I didn't - I worked direct from the data file. And I'd rubbed out empty years. So:<br /> name airpt urban country wmo mod lat lon alt startyr<br /> Victoria Int A 71 717990 NA 48.7 -123.4 20 1940<br /> endyr length<br /> 2000 61Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-16662982894732924412011-07-31T11:27:24.643+10:002011-07-31T11:27:24.643+10:00I hope you didn't trust the metadata.
717990
...I hope you didn't trust the metadata.<br /><br />717990<br />End Year 2007<br /><br />Actually data all -99 from 2001 to 2007Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-11019678303034924452011-07-30T06:25:35.151+10:002011-07-30T06:25:35.151+10:00Robert,
Here is the list of stations higher than 6...Robert,<br />Here is the list of stations higher than 60 lat in Canada that have reported since 2000:<br /> name wmo lat lon startyr endyr length<br />1 Norman Wells A 710430 65.3 -126.8 1943 2005 63<br />2 Sachs Harbour A 710510 72.0 -125.3 1955 2004 50<br />3 Fort Reliance 710730 62.7 -109.2 1948 2002 48<br />4 ISACHSEN 710740 78.8 -103.5 1949 2011 44<br />5 Hall Beach A 710810 68.8 -81.3 1957 2004 48<br />6 Alert 710820 82.5 -62.3 1950 2004 55<br />7 Clyde A 710900 70.5 -68.5 1942 2004 63<br />8 Dewar Lakes 710920 68.7 -71.2 1958 2003 38<br />9 Cape Dyer A 710940 66.6 -61.6 1959 2002 38<br />10 Pond Inlet A 710950 72.7 -78.0 1922 2005 82<br />11 Iqaluit A 719090 63.8 -68.5 1946 2004 59<br />12 Coral Harbour A 719150 64.2 -83.4 1933 2011 79<br />13 Eureka 719170 80.0 -85.9 1947 2011 65<br />14 ARCTIC BAY 719180 73.0 -85.2 1937 2002 35<br />15 Ennadai Lake 719230 61.1 -100.9 1949 2010 32<br />16 Resolute A 719240 74.7 -95.0 1947 2004 58<br />17 Cambridge Bay A 719250 69.1 -105.1 1929 2004 76<br />18 Baker Lake A 719260 64.3 -96.1 1946 2004 59<br />19 Hay River A 719350 60.8 -115.8 1895 2004 110<br />20 Coppermine A 719380 67.8 -115.1 1930 2005 76<br />21 Fort Simpson A 719460 61.8 -121.2 1895 2004 110<br />22 Inuvik A 719570 68.3 -133.5 1926 2004 79<br />23 Whitehorse A 719640 60.7 -135.1 1942 2011 70<br />24 Dawson A 719660 64.1 -139.1 1897 2011 115<br /><br /><br />I presume EC is the body that submits <a href="http://www.ogimet.com/cgi-bin/gclimat?lang=en&mode=1&state=Cana&ind=&ord=REV&verb=no&year=2011&mes=06&months=" rel="nofollow">CLIMAT</a> forms from Canada. I expect that CRUTEM, like GHCN, relies on those nowadays. As you'll see, there are 110 on this list.<br /><br />There seems to have been an intermittent problem where EC submits the forms but without supplying the normals page for a number of stations. I don't know why that is. GHCN could calculate them themselves, but now that things have gotten legalistic, they insist that the submitting organisations take that responsibility.<br /><br />So if there is a problem there, it's not clear who is at fault.Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-14130985377483084112011-07-30T04:53:55.415+10:002011-07-30T04:53:55.415+10:00Pretty disappointed with Hadley's coverage in ...Pretty disappointed with Hadley's coverage in high latitude Canada. Could easily be supplemented by Environment Canada if someone would incorporate it.Robert Waynoreply@blogger.com