tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post6189702084476863550..comments2024-03-28T13:56:47.604+11:00Comments on moyhu: Adjusting the past.Nick Stokeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-55665200985754161122015-01-05T14:04:29.031+11:002015-01-05T14:04:29.031+11:00I'm reading this because you linked to your bl...I'm reading this because you linked to your blog in WUWT and all I got was<br />"Sorry, the page you were looking for in this blog does not exist."<br /><br />It happens, so do mistakes by bloggers. Embarrassing but only a big deal if it gets through peer-review which you suggest that it didn't (comments on BH).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-9635116237991060212014-08-04T17:04:08.030+10:002014-08-04T17:04:08.030+10:00Not scientifically interesting. But all three blog...Not scientifically interesting. But all three bloggers (including AW) tried to explain themselves, and the author as well chipping in, although since her paper was not on the topic at all, she didn't have much to add.<br /><br />I noticed David Appell's banning disappeared from the resurrected thread.<br />Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-67536018095485442052014-08-04T16:29:35.490+10:002014-08-04T16:29:35.490+10:00Is there interesting stuff there? There's noth...Is there interesting stuff there? There's nothing interesting from a scientific point of view: just a rehash of the same old stupid misunderstandings and the obvious answers. People agree that's its great to write utter tripe, because "science is all about correcting errors", or some other transparent excuse for ignorance. Denica Bozhinova and says some obvious things, too. What were the interesting bits (this is a serious question)?William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-6900917422950966302014-08-04T10:21:43.165+10:002014-08-04T10:21:43.165+10:00Yes. There is context (and lots of interesting stu...Yes. There is context (and lots of interesting stuff) on <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/29/epa-document-supports-3-of-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-is-attributable-to-human-sources/#comment-1698439" rel="nofollow">this thread</a>.Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-10494053591100360612014-08-04T05:45:34.502+10:002014-08-04T05:45:34.502+10:00The post is now back, headed by a disclaimer that ...The post is now back, headed by a disclaimer that its all tripe.<br /><br />Cite: http://www.webcitation.org/6RYdV0x3HWilliam M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-8818531939106627722014-07-25T21:19:54.693+10:002014-07-25T21:19:54.693+10:00> the deleted post is there in full at Climate ...> the deleted post is there in full at Climate Depot<br /><br />Complete with "Read the Full Article" link which goes to the deleted article :-)William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-38444383016834018832014-07-25T20:53:47.974+10:002014-07-25T20:53:47.974+10:00No. I was put on moderation during this thread, an...No. I was put on moderation during <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/28/the-scientific-method-is-at-work-on-the-ushcn-temperature-data-set/" rel="nofollow">this thread</a>, and stayed there for some weeks. But AW seemed to indicate <a href="http://rankexploits.com/musings/2014/cooktcp-speaking-event/#comment-131063" rel="nofollow">here</a> that this should have been a temporary measure enabling my responses to get enhanced attention, and he just forgot to switch it off. And indeed, I do seem to be unmoderated now.<br /><br />Reverting to HS, the deleted post is there in full at <a href="http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/07/19/new-paper-finds-only-3-75-of-atmospheric-co2-is-man-made-from-burning-of-fossil-fuels-published-in-atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics/" rel="nofollow">Climate Depot</a>.<br />Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-31707286300302093532014-07-25T20:45:20.183+10:002014-07-25T20:45:20.183+10:00> I wonder if David Appell is still banned.
Sp...> I wonder if David Appell is still banned.<br /><br />Speaking of such: are you banned at WUWT?William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-52808413881707938862014-07-25T06:58:59.770+10:002014-07-25T06:58:59.770+10:00But there's nothing peculiar about the indiffe...But there's nothing peculiar about the indifference. The childlike credulity of Montford, Homewood et al. is wholly typical of a class of people who with supreme irony have appropriated the term "sceptic", which once upon a time described an outlook exactly the opposite to their approach of coming to judgement on the basis of b***er all evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-66360127017802507152014-07-24T18:10:33.712+10:002014-07-24T18:10:33.712+10:00I think what is of interest is not what was said -...I think what is of interest is not what was said - the post is repeated elsewhere on line, and the comments were not unusual, apart from the peculiar indifference to what the paper actually said. Rather it is the existing links that lead to nothing. And the embarrassment of the void - I gather HS got a blast from the authors.<br />Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-5831257115786647652014-07-24T17:13:21.499+10:002014-07-24T17:13:21.499+10:00Always take a webcite...Always take a webcite...William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.com