tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post3193984132373811225..comments2024-03-28T13:56:47.604+11:00Comments on moyhu: An active viewer for Marcott et al proxiesNick Stokeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-85500541817289710752013-03-27T16:35:21.745+11:002013-03-27T16:35:21.745+11:00Thanks Doug,
I always try to remember that there a...Thanks Doug,<br />I always try to remember that there are a lot more people reading than commenting.Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-39489427362294749232013-03-27T16:30:15.338+11:002013-03-27T16:30:15.338+11:00Nick, Thanks for fighting the good fight on WUWT. ...Nick, Thanks for fighting the good fight on WUWT. Needless to say, you don't get a lot of support there. Some people can't see what's happening right under their noses, if it challenges fossilized beliefs.Doug G.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-28559190414412113382013-03-23T09:01:46.423+11:002013-03-23T09:01:46.423+11:00Thanks, Paul. I'm working on a version with mu...Thanks, Paul. I'm working on a version with multi-options, to show the different dating effects. I will probably use a 2000 yr interval; that's about 3 yr per pixel, which I think is quite a lot of pixels per resolution period.Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729093380675162051.post-88683674168433404602013-03-22T23:59:44.198+11:002013-03-22T23:59:44.198+11:00Hi Nick, this is helpful. One more suggestion that...Hi Nick, this is helpful. One more suggestion that would be really useful: since the controversy is about the recent uptick, would it be possible to do a version where the time axis is just the last, say, 400 years?<br /><br />PaulMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com